A dancing mix

My new music intake rate is still quite low. This year did involve some time digging through the crates for the most danceworthy music for the wedding, though. That process fed about 70% of the content in this mix, although very few of these tracks actually got played at the wedding.

We have gone to the Hillside festival the last two years, but I haven’t been quite as inspired by the acts as I was during my first visit to the festival. Patrick Watson and Holy Fuck are the two most notable exceptions, both delivering great sets.

There’s a heavy acid jazz / nu-jazz component to this mix. I have a particular soft spot for two of the final tracks here. The atmosphere of the Kruder & Dorfmeister Lamb remix is a little over-the-top, but remains my favourite acid jazz track of all time. The Herbaliser’s live rendition of “The Missing Suitcase” has been in my collection for a decade, but never really caught my full attention. The wedding hunt brought it to the foreground as a great, danceable, organic jazzy track – and dancing to it at the wedding with friends was a highlight for me.

So, download the mix here (for a few weeks only). The tracklist is below, also with the album/compilation where I first heard the tracks.

  1. moondog. bird’s lament [henrik schwarz remix]. jazz + house, from dj-kicks – henrik schwarz compilation, 2006.
  2. omar-s. flying gorgars. techno, from fabric 45, 2009.
  3. the crystal method. blowout. big beat, from tweekend, 2001.
  4. radioactive man. uranium. electro, from andrew weatherall – from the bunker (a rotter’s golf club mix) compilation, 2007.
  5. the soft pink truth. promofunk. electro, from colette no. 5 compilation, 2003.
  6. erlend øye. sheltered life / fine day. electro, from dj-kicks – erlend øye compilation, 2004.
  7. daniel lanois. i love you. pop, from shine, 2003.
  8. patrick watson. tracy’s waters. rock, from wooden arms, 2009.
  9. radiohead. 15 steps. rock, from in rainbows, 2007.
  10. skalpel. quiz. acid jazz, from skalpel, 2004.
  11. thunderball. solar. downtempo, from modular systems compilation, 2001.
  12. caribou. jamelia. electronic / rock, from swim, 2010.
  13. holy fuck. stay lit. rock, from latin, 2010.
  14. gorillaz. feel good inc. rock / hip hop, from demon days, 2005.
  15. povo. uam uam [moonstarr remix]. acid jazz, from future sounds of jazz vol. 10 compilation, 2005.
  16. the herbaliser band. the missing suitcase [session one]. acid jazz, from session one, 2000.
  17. lamb. trans fatty acid [k&d session]. acid jazz, from kruder & dorfmeister – the k&d sessions compilation, 1998.
  18. portishead. the rip. trip hop, from third, 2008.

Passive Portfolio Performance, 2010

My post last year on my passive portfolio generated a lively conversation, so I thought I’d follow up with a few further thoughts on investment over the last year.

But first, a quick glance at the performance of the portfolio I showed last year:

Weight Asset
Weight
Return
2009
Return
2010
Return
2009-10
Equities
   U.S.A. VTI 42.3% 11.2% 10.2% 22.5%
   Europe / Pacific (developed) VEA 40.4% 10.2% 1.9% 12.3%
   Emerging VWO 7.3% 49.7% 12.3% 68.1%
   Canada XIC 10.0% 34.1% 17.2% 57.2%
Subtotal 70% 15.9% 7.7% 24.9%
Fixed income
XSB 25% 4.2% 3.2% 7.5%
Cash 5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Total Portfolio 12.2% 6.2% 19.2%

Basically, a slower year: 6.2% return overall, with none of last year’s extraordinary post-recession performances, and a drag from the various European crises (VEA).

This is, however, no longer my target portfolio. I’ve made a few minor adjustments:

  • Doubled the Canadian component of the portfolio from 10% of equities to 20%, to take advantage of tax benefits. Dividends from VTI, VEA and VWO all incur U.S. withholding tax in my non-registered and TFSA accounts (but not in my RRSP).  By contrast, dividends from Canadian stocks result in reduced tax in my non-registered account and no tax in my TFSA.
  • I’m now treating XIC (an ETF) and TDB900 (a TD e-series index fund) as interchangeable ways of buying into the Canadian market.  I use TDB900 when I’m making small regular contributions, and XIC for large $5000+ purchases.
  • I haven’t found an equivalent low-cost index fund for the other parts of my portfolio.  I’m particularly cautious about the tax effects of holding Canadian-based funds that just buy an underlying American security.
  • I’ve changed my asset mix to lower the total level of bonds from 25% to 15%.  This follows a discussion last year with both Chris and Jordan suggesting 0% bonds for a young person.  I read Jordan’s suggested book, Milevsky’s Are You a Stock or a Bond? and found it very convincing – my future income stream is already very “bond-like” and really doesn’t require me to own much further bonds in my portfolio. That said, I’m still reluctant to buy stocks on margin, as the book suggests for my situation.
  • On real estate, I’m feeling more comfortable with my current rental situation.  Milevsky has a new book out (excerpt here) with a bit more discussion of real estate. The core of his argument is that real estate performance is closely correlated with the economy of a metropolitan region – and therefore closely correlated with your own future job prospects and future income stream.  Owning a home while young can therefore result in too little diversification in your portfolio, if you include your future income as part of the “full” portfolio.That said, there are many other benefits to home ownership: full control over your environment, a greater range of home choices in the Canadian market where rental pickings can be quite slim, and even a guarantee of non-eviction from a fickle landlord (I’m thinking of Eddy & Angela, who were evicted while 8.5 months pregnant, perhaps so the landlord could avoid having a noisy baby in the building).  But for the moment, I don’t personally feel that I need to own a house… yet.

Finally, I’ve heard a few interesting other reading points over the last year:

  • Hendrik pointed out an article comparing the full return associated with bond ETFs versus holding actual bonds, noting that “return” is more important than alleged “yield.”
  • I looked into (commercial) Real Estate Income Trusts (REITs) briefly, but decided not to buy. There are arguments over whether real estate is actually a “new asset class” distinct from equities. But more importantly, I found a great, detailed, statistics-packed article from Vanguard on the subject.  The article closes with a list of propositions that they suggest an investor should “buy into” in order to justify REITs… and I just wasn’t sufficiently in agreement to add REITs as a separate group in my asset mix.  That said, if I was buying REITs, I’d probably aim to go beyond Canada – the Canadian REIT index is little more than a handful of stocks.

So, that’s my update on finances.  Any reactions?

Wedding & photos

J and I got married last weekend in a lovely Muskoka ceremony. We’d like to share photos with everyone – photos of us, photos of other guests, and moments we missed. To do that, we’d really appreciate it if guests can send us their photos!

Photos are big – often too big for e-mail.  We’ve set up a way to make it work. Please :

  1. Put your edited but uncompressed photos in a Zip file.
  2. Use your name for the zip file (e.g., I would use “DavidP.zip”)
  3. Visit our drop box

If you’re having trouble, you can e-mail them to David instead.

We won’t have the professional pics until November. In the interim, here are a few photos:

  1. Flickr: best photos
  2. Flickr: there’s a bigger batch of photos in this group, and I’d request any Flickr-using photographers to add their photos to the group.
  3. Facebook: you know where to find us.

Upgraded

After neglecting this blog for a long time, I’ve just upgraded from WordPress 2.2 to WordPress 3.0.

I’ve also tried moving it from http://personal.davidpritchard.org to http://davidpritchard.org/personal, in a desperate attempt to get Google to admit that it exists. For some reason, Google Webmaster tells me that this site has 70 URLs in its sitemap, but Google’s index contains 0 URLs. If you have any idea why this would happen, let me know.